post

Footer About

Footer Contribute

Footer Get Involved

Footer Links

Mind the Product

Guest Post

How to build a companion product and win user trust

mission statement

Deep dive: Crafting your product vision and mission

B2B product management

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML)

Building Product Teams

Business Strategy

Data Driven Product Management

Digital Transformation

Diversity and Inclusion

Minimum Viable Product

OKRs

Prioritisation

Product Design

Product Research

Product Development Process

Product Ethics

Product Discovery

Product Leadership

Product Management Career

Product Strategy

Stakeholder Management

🌎 <a href="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/world-product-day/" style="color:#FFFFFF;text-decoration:underline;">Happy World Product Day!</a> Be sure to celebrate product, yourself, and your peers today! 🎉

Join us at #mtpcon London in 2025 – mark your calendars

How Google makes AI work at Enterprise scale – Miku Jha (Director, AI/ML and Generative AI, Google Cloud)

5 ways to invent and simplify as an AI/ML product manager

Why teams often struggle with OKRs: A conversation with Jeff Gothelf

Building your own user experience and software stack: This week’s product news

Andres is a freelance writer and digital marketer with a background in engineering and a keen interest in the latest technology advancements. He currently helps tech companies and startups tell their stories by turning their complex ideas into easy to understand material. You can reach out to him on LinkedIn

Andres Phillips

<p>In this <a href="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/producttank/">ProductTank </a>Toronto talk, Nate Archer, now Senior Product Manager at <a href="https://www.ada.support/">Ada</a><a href="https://www.ada.support/"> </a>shares with us a systematic approach to validating an idea by breaking it down into testable hypotheses.</p>
<p>His key points include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Origins</li>
<li>Purpose and Value</li>
<li>Process</li>
<li>Case Study</li>
</ul>
<p>Watch the video to see his talk in full. Or read on for an overview of his key points.</p>
<h2>The Origins of Hypothesis-Driven Validation</h2>
<p>Nate explains that hypothesis-driven validation provides a framework to help product teams validate more quickly and efficiently by breaking down their ideas. It embraces the uncertainty inherent in what product managers do. New products always include a lot of risk, this process acknowledges assumptions and reduces that risk.</p>
<h2>Its Purpose and Value</h2>
<p>The purpose of this approach is not to be different from traditional design and validation approach, Nate states. Instead, the framework helps to manage the process more easily and help teams better identify specific risks and squash them quickly. It is also best used in early-stage product discovery, whether that be a new product or feature.</p>
<h2>The Process</h2>
<p>The hypothesis-driven validation process starts with extracting assumptions and writing hypotheses. Extracting assumptions helps to determine the amount of risk for each course of action. Next these hypotheses are ranked and tests are designed. These tests are then ranked followed by a period of building, measuring and learning. This follows the lean testing approach of using a repeatable method to validate ideas. Finally, extract what was learned and act on it by iterating until it is time for an MVP.</p>
<h2>A Case Study</h2>
<p>At the time of his talk, Nate was a Product Manager at <a href="https://www.connected.io/">Connected Lab.</a> He described how his team had used this approach to work on a product concept. They spent six weeks generating research to define their opportunities, three weeks generating the concept and defining the product, and then six weeks performing hypothesis-driven validation. This period showed them that some of the assumptions they made before weren’t applicable and helped to redefine their approach.</p>
<p>The key takeaways from this talk are that it is important to extract hypotheses as early as possible and use them to structure all other activities. Also, stick to an organizing method to keep your team aligned and focused on the goal.</p>

core/freeform

Hypothesis and Testing

The journey to product experimentation by Split

Progressive product development: release products that deliver by Split

Surveillance art, dying phones, and fake likes – Dries Depoorter at MTP Engage Hamburg

Understanding and executing effective research

What’s stopping teams from running experiments by Cameron Savage

How to be a better data-driven product manager

Product’s role in experimentation culture by Terry Lee

Stay Humble or Be Humbled — Case Studies from the Experimentation Trenches by Anthony Rindone

Looking at the bigger picture by Rita Cervetto

Testing Business Ideas, by David Bland

Hypothesis Driven Validation By Nate Archer

ProductTank Pune

ProductTank Kraków

ProductTank Cardiff

ProductTank Bangalore

ProductTank Mumbai

ProductTank Johannesburg

ProductTank Tauranga

ProductTank Bielefeld

ProductTank Auckland

ProductTank Vilnius

ProductTank Timisoara

ProductTank Stockholm

ProductTank München

ProductTank Düsseldorf

ProductTank Birmingham

ProductTank Norwich

ProductTank Heidelberg

ProductTank Malmö

ProductTank Amsterdam

ProductTank Barcelona

ProductTank Newcastle Upon Tyne

ProductTank London

ProductTank Curitiba

ProductTank Brisbane

ProductTank Perth

ProductTank Málaga

ProductTank Buenos Aires

ProductTank Tokyo

ProductTank Braunschweig

ProductTank Edinburgh

ProductTank Pittsburgh

ProductTank Dubai

ProductTank Vienna

ProductTank Bristol

ProductTank Washington

ProductTank Valencia

ProductTank Raleigh

ProductTank Brno

ProductTank Paris

ProductTank Orlando

ProductTank Montréal

ProductTank Bangkok

ProductTank San Diego

ProductTank Hong Kong

ProductTank Charlotte

ProductTank Exeter

ProductTank Manchester