post

Footer About

Footer Contribute

Footer Get Involved

Footer Links

Mind the Product

Mobile

Mobile vs Web Product Management, what’s the difference?

Podcast

Tools and techniques to scale product teams – Charlotte King (Lead Product Manager, eBay)

B2B product management

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML)

Building Product Teams

Business Strategy

Data Driven Product Management

Digital Transformation

Diversity and Inclusion

Minimum Viable Product

OKRs

Prioritisation

Product Design

Product Research

Product Development Process

Product Ethics

Product Discovery

Product Leadership

Product Management Career

Product Strategy

Stakeholder Management

🌎 <a href="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/world-product-day/" style="color:#FFFFFF;text-decoration:underline;">Happy World Product Day!</a> Be sure to celebrate product, yourself, and your peers today! 🎉

Why great product managers think like therapists

How you can drive business impact as a product manager by Matt LeMay at #mtpcon London 2025

Duolingo announces AI-first strategy

What AI can’t—and shouldn’t—do for product managers

A case study : Phased approach to driving Reels production on Facebook

Eira is an editor for Mind the Product. She's been a business journalist, editor, and copywriter for longer than she cares to think about.

Eira Hayward

Almost two months on from the launch of Threads, what have we learned? What is Meta’s plan for the app, how is it faring as a rival to X, the social network formerly known as Twitter, and what, if anything, does it teach us about launching products?
Threads launched with a bang on 5 July. It broke records to become the fastest growing app ever, gaining 100 million users in the week following its launch. Since then active user numbers and retention have tailed off.
<h3>A flying start</h3>
According to Similarweb numbers shared with Gizmodo, the number of Threads daily active users sat at about 49 million two days after launch, and had plummeted to 9.6 million by the start of August. On July 6, time spent on the app in all available markets was about 14 minutes a day, and this had dropped to 2.3 minutes by the start of August. A huge initial burst of enthusiasm before people went back to their old ways.
The launch of Threads was well-timed &#8211; an old-fashioned kick ‘em when they’re down tactic &#8211; but its functionality is limited. There are lots of features still missing from Threads that the legions of disenchanted Twitter users (according to some estimates over a million users have left the platform since Elon Musk bought it) might have hoped to see at launch. There were plenty of analyses on what was missing from Threads at launch. This article, <a href="https://www.verdict.co.uk/threads-active-users-drop-revealing-lack-of-original-content/?cf-view&amp;cf-closed" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Threads active users drop revealing lack of original content</a>, and this article, <a href="https://medium.com/re-verb/pulling-at-the-seams-how-is-threads-keeping-up-f122e796d689" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Pulling at the Seams: How is Threads Keeping Up?</a> for example, look at what was missing and suggest that Threads needs to do more than offer what’s available elsewhere to succeed.
<h3>A long game</h3>
We should remember the power of inertia. It takes a lot of resources and a compelling user experience to unseat an entrenched market leader, no matter how much of its shine it has lost. However new features and functionality are being added to Threads all the time, and this <a href="https://about.fb.com/news/2023/07/introducing-threads-new-app-text-sharing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">news release</a> from Meta indicates the rate at which new features are being added. We must assume that Meta is relying on its heft and its abilities to engage its users long term to play a long game.
The financial markets appear to like Meta at the moment and its latest set of results show it has returned to double-digit growth. It has <a href="https://www.thestack.technology/meta-ai-investment/#:~:text=Meta%20to%20spend%20up%20to,pledges%20open%20approach%20to%20LLMs&amp;text=Meta%20plans%20to%20spend%20%2433,on%20a%20Q1%20earnings%20call." target="_blank" rel="noopener">invested heavily in AI</a>, and, according to <a href="https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/08/08/meta-platforms-stock-is-a-buy-on-solid-earnings-an/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Motley Fool</a>,  there is a sense of optimism about the company&#8217;s trajectory.
<h3>A super app future?</h3>
What’s the end game for Meta though? For that perhaps we need to look at Elon Musk’s ambitions for X. Musk’s interest in developing a super app has long been known. The rebranding of Twitter to X is another step along this path, as this article from The Verge, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/26/23808796/elon-musks-x-everything-app-vision" target="_blank" rel="noopener">For Elon Musk, X equals everything</a>, details, and this more recent announcement, <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-08-31/musk-says-x-to-offer-video-audio-calls-in-move-toward-super-app?leadSource=uverify%20wall" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Musk Says X Will Offer Video and Audio Calls in Move Toward Super-App</a>, confirms.
Many suggest that Meta has a similar ambition. Last year Mark Zuckerberg unveiled a number of updates that make it easier for WhatsApp users to find, message and buy from businesses.  The updates were launched in Brazil, a country seen as ready for the super apps like WeChat and Gojek, already widely used in Asia. This article, <a href="https://www.retailtouchpoints.com/topics/digital-commerce/mobile-commerce/meta-whatsapp-brazil-commerce-business-payments-app" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Meta’s WhatsApp Takes Another Step Toward ‘Super App’ Status with Commerce Enhancements</a>, outlines the updates.
But is it likely that super apps will find receptive audiences in more mature markets?  Opinions vary. A recent article from Forrester Research, <a href="https://www.forrester.com/blogs/the-super-app-window-has-closed/?ref_search=0_1692704407395" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Super App Window Has Closed</a>, thinks not. It finds that super apps like WeChat exploited first-mover advantages. The analyst says they were in the right place at the right time and served a trusting user base that needed them, very much not the case today. Forrester says that: “Firms should steer away from building a super app and instead invest in creating a robust mobile strategy.”
But a <a href="https://www.pymnts.com/connectedeconomy/2022/the-data-point-72-percent-consumers-interested-super-apps/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 study</a> from PayPal and PYMNTS found that many consumers in mature markets would be interested in using a super app to replace the half dozen or so they use at the moment. This Harvard Business Review article, <a href="https://hbr.org/2023/04/are-super-apps-coming-to-the-u-s-market" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Are Super Apps Coming to the US Market?</a> sets out why super apps haven’t found favour in the US so far, but suggests that attitudes may be changing. It predicts that while we won’t see Asian-style super apps in mature markets, there will be appetite for super-ish apps &#8211; ones with super-app like ecosystems.

core/freeform

International strategy with a 360 view by Chris Butler

Placing product bets on your roadmap by Indicative

Incomplete by design – Matt LeMay at MTP Engage Hamburg 2022

Building an effective product strategy – four key takeaways

Learnings from London: Critical thinking for product teams by Teresa Torres

Learnings from London: Going from Meh to Awesome by Shiva Rajaraman

Learnings from London: How to build a billion dollar app

Using principles to make better decisions faster by Martin Eriksson

How to build for creators by Peter Yang

Jedi discovery and delivery by Lisa Mo Wagner

What lies in store for Threads?

ProductTank Athens

ProductTank Montréal

ProductTank Córdoba

ProductTank Seattle

ProductTank Mumbai

ProductTank Berlin

ProductTank Köln

ProductTank Chicago

ProductTank Washington

ProductTank Vilnius

ProductTank Malmö

ProductTank Abu Dhabi

ProductTank Genève

ProductTank Belfast

ProductTank London

ProductTank Porto

ProductTank Victoria

ProductTank México City

ProductTank Pune

ProductTank Hyderabad

ProductTank Valencia

ProductTank Auckland

ProductTank Helsinki

ProductTank Barcelona

ProductTank San Diego

ProductTank Canberra

ProductTank Perth

ProductTank Bangkok

ProductTank Doha

ProductTank Tel Aviv-Yafo

ProductTank Reston

ProductTank Raleigh

ProductTank Charlotte

ProductTank Richmond

ProductTank Edinburgh

ProductTank Paris

ProductTank Hamburg

ProductTank München

ProductTank Manchester

ProductTank Bristol

ProductTank Oxford

ProductTank Madrid

ProductTank Des Moines

ProductTank Dallas

ProductTank Portland

ProductTank Curitiba

ProductTank Philadelphia

ProductTank Los Angeles

ProductTank Gdansk

ProductTank Pittsburgh

ProductTank Chennai

ProductTank Fribourg

ProductTank Norwich

ProductTank Zürich

ProductTank Denver

ProductTank San Francisco

ProductTank Sheffield

ProductTank Tokyo

ProductTank Columbus

ProductTank Reading

What lies in store for Threads?

Eira Hayward

Read more